The narrative is everywhere: AI can't write. It's hollow. It's obvious. It turns people off.

The proof? Anthropic just posted a $320K writer position. OpenAI is paying $393K for content strategists. Scale AI is hiring poets and fiction writers.

"See?" everyone says. "Even the AI companies won't use AI for important writing."

But here's what nobody's asking: What if they're hiring writers not because AI can't write well—but because 99% of people are using AI completely wrong?

The uncomfortable truth: This entire article was written by Claude.

And I'm willing to bet you didn't notice until just now.

Here's how most people use AI:

Open ChatGPT → Type "write a blog post about X" → Hit enter → Copy mediocre output → Wonder why it feels hollow.

They treat AI like a vending machine. Put in a prompt, get out slop.

Then they conclude: "AI writing doesn't work."

No. Your process doesn't work.

Professional writers don't produce great work in one draft. They iterate. They refine. They collaborate with editors who push back and demand better.

Why would AI be any different?

The difference between AI content that screams "written by GPT-4" and content that works isn't the model.

It's the process.

I didn't type "write an article about AI writing" and ship the first output.

I gave Claude style examples. I specified the exact tone and structure. I iterated through multiple drafts. I refined specific sections that weren't working. I rejected alternatives that missed the mark.

The result? Writing that makes an argument about AI-generated content feeling hollow—while being AI-generated content that doesn't feel hollow.

The framework I used has 5 distinct phases:

Most people skip straight to Phase 2 and stop there. That's why their content fails.

Let me offer a different explanation for those $320K writer positions.

AI companies aren't hiring writers because AI can't write well.

They're hiring writers because:

Someone needs to know what good writing looks like. You can't evaluate AI output without understanding what excellence means. Those writers aren't replacing AI—they're directing it.

Someone needs to apply the collaborative process. Writing isn't a one-shot task. It's iterative. Those expensive writers know how to extract the best work from AI tools through strategic iteration.

Someone needs to make the judgment calls. AI generates options. Humans decide which options align with strategy, brand, and goals. That judgment is what commands premium rates.

The companies building AI understand something most people don't: AI doesn't replace human judgment. It amplifies it.

But only if you know how to use it correctly.

AI keeps coming up at work, but you still don't get it?

That's exactly why 1M+ professionals working at Google, Meta, and OpenAI read Superhuman AI daily.

Here's what you get:

Join 1M+ pros

Mistake #1: They use vague prompts

"Write something engaging about productivity."

What tone? What style? What format? AI has to guess. The guess will be mediocre.

Mistake #2: They accept first drafts

The first output is AI's educated guess based on your instructions. Sometimes it's close. Often it's not.

Professionals iterate. Amateurs ship first drafts.

Mistake #3: They don't provide examples

"Make it conversational." "Keep it professional." "Be engaging."

These mean different things to different people. Show AI what you want. Don't just tell it.

Mistake #4: They give vague feedback

"This doesn't sound right." "Make it better."

AI can't fix what you can't articulate. Specific feedback produces specific improvements.

Mistake #5: They treat it like a search engine

AI generates text based on patterns. It doesn't look up facts. If you trust it blindly with factual claims, you'll get plausible-sounding nonsense.

Fix these five mistakes and your AI writing immediately improves 10x.

But there's more to it than that.

I spent three weeks documenting the exact process I use to create content with AI that humans can't detect.

Not just "use better prompts." The complete system:

109 pages. The full collaborative AI writing playbook.

Why am I giving it away free?

Because I believe there's a window here. A period where people who understand how to actually use AI well will build advantages that compound for years.

While everyone else is still arguing "AI can't write," the people using this system are producing content that proves otherwise.

Get the complete playbook here →

AI amplifies whatever you put into it.

Put in lazy prompts and vague instructions? You get amplified mediocrity—content that's obviously AI-generated and obviously bad.

Put in strategic direction, clear examples, and iterative refinement? You get amplified excellence—content that exceeds what most humans would produce alone.

The companies building AI know this. That's why they're hiring expensive writers who understand the collaborative process, not replacing them with one-shot AI generation.

They're not rejecting AI. They're rejecting bad process.

Here's what separates the professionals who'll thrive with AI from those who'll keep complaining about it:

The complainers: Try AI once, get mediocre results, conclude it doesn't work, go back to doing everything manually.

The professionals: Learn the system, iterate until it works, build repeatable processes, operate at 10x velocity with better results.

Six months from now, there will be two types of content creators:

Those using collaborative AI systems, producing high-quality content faster than ever, capturing opportunities others miss.

And those still doing everything manually, wondering why they're falling behind.

The playbook exists. The system works. The results speak for themselves.

This article is the proof.

Download the complete system here →

Anthropic isn't hiring a $320K writer because Claude can't write.

They're hiring someone who knows how to use Claude correctly.

There's a massive difference.

And if you learn the system now—while most people are still dismissing AI writing entirely—you'll have a 12-18 month head start on everyone who wakes up later.

The tools exist. The process works. The only question is: will you learn it before everyone else does?

Get the playbook here and start creating content that works →

The writing wars are over. Collaborative AI won. The only question is: will you exploit the advantage before restrictions hit?